*rant*rave*
Jun. 7th, 2005 07:22 pmThou SHALT Use Apostrophes With Possessives
Viggo stood naked in the doorway, holding bowls of strawberries and cream.
NOT bowl's or strawberrie's
Orlando's knees buckled and he lunged forward, pouncing on Viggo.
JUST Orlando's
NEVER NEVER NEVER with Plurals.
This has been a Bitchy Public Service Announcement. Thank you for your attention.
Note:
The LOTR boys' affinity for being caught snogging in the tabloids still follows the rule - plural possessive.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 04:48 am (UTC)Now if you could please add 'The Use of the Apostrophe for the Advanced':
Use a possessive 's' with words that end on 's': Thomas's cat.
Use only an apostrophe when you've already used a plural 's': the Petersons' cat.
Argh!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 05:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 05:04 am (UTC)It could be a regional thing, too, possibly...
Don't you love being a big grammar geek? :)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 05:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 05:59 am (UTC)I'm sure the 's's' rule is right, it's probably one of those rules which is dying out because people don't use it anymore. (Like past perfect, which drives me nuts!) It still seems to be correct in England, at least my professor corrected me on it!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 06:14 am (UTC)Yes, a writer can change POV midscene, but the writer had better telegraph this very clearly to the reader.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 08:31 am (UTC)*giggles*
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 10:01 am (UTC)*giggles* And how many errors did I make in that little statement? hehehe, but yeah, I meant what I said. In Iceland we don't even have apostrophes. And with that I'd also like to thank you because I just learned something from your post :)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 03:31 pm (UTC)But thank you for pointing out that other languages may not use apostrophes - I didn't know that.
*cough* Grammar Police Says: you're (because it's a contraction of you are), they're (contraction of they are), whether, and it's (contraction of it is).
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 03:34 pm (UTC)Seriously though, I'm always happy to answer grammar questions, and to look up the answer when I don't know it. I'm a big geek that way. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 03:38 pm (UTC)oh yes, I agree with you on that part. I work really hard to make as few mistakes in English as possible and NEVER say anything without Spell-Checking it first, well... except when I'm just saying, 'ohmygod Orlando's so hawt!!' *g* because he is *giggles*
but yeah, it's disrespectful to the language and not to mention just plain annoying!
Grammar Police
you do know I did those mistakes on purpose, right? hehehehe
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 03:38 pm (UTC)I agree that it's massively annoying and frequently confusing when POV switches without very clear phrasing. I'm not sure if it's grammatically wrong, though. It may be simply an indication of poor writing style.
*You* could write a rant. It could be a multi-slash-author ongoing series of grammar peeves!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 03:42 pm (UTC)"it's probably one of those rules which is dying out because people don't use it anymore" -- I think you're probably 100% correct. Which always brings up the odd contradictory feeling in my head that I want hard and fast rules so that I know what is correct... but it's also nice to see proof that the language is still alive, still changing.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-08 03:45 pm (UTC)but he *is* HAWT!!!11!!! OMG *DIEZ*
*giggles*
no subject
Date: 2005-06-12 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-13 01:34 am (UTC)I, too, am often dismayed that some of the best story ideas seem to come to people who could use a little more work on their writing skills. It makes me sad to realize that the norm of public education is slipping so much. I wish there was a polite way to say "your story idea is great but you need a much better beta." Ah well.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-13 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-13 09:04 pm (UTC)I hope you find more time to read! :)